CHESS Magazine April 2025 - Editorial by IM Malcolm Pein
 Do you want the good news or the bad news? Good News First The eight-part series is done rather in the style of shows like Bake Off, with an added touch of The Traitors thrown in, with the inclusion of Birmingham chess coach Anthony Mathurin as sidekick to the imperious GM David Howell on commentary. David is superb, of course, and the whole thing is held together by the wonderful Sue Perkins of Mel and Sue fame, amongst many other things.  The star presenting team of BBC2’s Chess Masters: The Endgame, David Howell, host Sue Perkins and Anthony Mathurin, a former Traitors contestant who is also a chess coach for CSC.
I certainly have some reservations about the way it’s turned out, particularly in the editing suite. However, since my services were dispensed with once the programme had secured its commission, I probably shouldn’t say anymore, other than to emphasise what a great thing it is for British chess that the game has received the recognition of the national broadcaster. Let’s hope it leads to even more coverage of chess in future.
Suit You, Sir!
Talking of Anthony Mathurin, the highlight of early January/February TV in both the UK and the USA has been the surprise hit reality game show The Traitors – based on the original Dutch programme De Verraders – filmed back-to-back in the same location of Ardross Castle, the 19th-century country pile of the McTaggart family, set deep in the vast wilderness of the Scottish Highlands, about 30 miles north of Inverness. The tag line states: “Get them before they get you. 22 strangers play the ultimate mind game of trust and treachery.” And perhaps inspired by last year’s Swedish version of the now international franchise, Förrädarna, that had popular chess streamer WFM Anna Cramling among its contestants, both the UK and US adaptations opted to include chess. One of the challenges was an outdoor living chess contest to whittle the field down. Many on social media were quick to point out that the board was the wrong way round, and also how it seemed to mimic the Wizards Chess scene in the first Harry Potter movie; the twist here in Traitors being that the contestants had to pit their wits against an oversized black chess piece with an attitude, who would hover (or should that be hoover?) around the board, almost as if standing on an oversized Roomba.  But the American Traitors in February might well have given FIDE something of a headache about whether or not to penalise its multi-award-winning host, Scottish actor Alan Cumming (pictured right), for infringing any possible number of dress code violations. Cumming has a reputation of being a flirtatious popinjay, and his outfit for the chess challenge proved to be nothing short of a haute couture hoot with it being a fusion of K-Pop and punk, the pièce de résistance being what many initially thought were African Bantu knots in his hair, but was in fact a bespoke chess piece headband. As it went viral on social media, his stylist, Sam Spector excitedly gushed: “When I saw this Charles Jeffrey Loverboy red suit with its enlarged plaid, I was immediately reminded of a checkerboard. So, naturally, I had to add the perfect amount of absurdity and created this custom-made chess piece headband. Topped off with a blown-up houndstooth coat, it all came together and Alan worthy!” ChessFest 2025  Do come down and enjoy the living chess in Trafalgar Square at ChessFest on Sunday July 13th! There will also be free simuls, coaching, the beat-the-master tent and sets to use galore.
Our Golden Generations
Congratulations again to the England over-65 team who triumphed at the World Senior Team Chess Championships last month in Prague. Fantastic performances all round, particularly from IM Peter Large, a stalwart of the weekend circuit back in the day, who scored a tremendous 7/8. Peter annotates inside, where we have a report from Terry Chapman, who also had a fine tournament. Our over-50 team led by Mickey Adams was once again outgunned by the USA, who, as Leonard Barden pointed out, are backed by the largesse of Saint Louis Chess Club. England can though compete for the gold medals at this level if we can get all our players to turn out. Supratit Banerjee, 11, from Sutton was given his first opportunity in a all-play-all tournament recently at Lawrence Cooper’s Wood Green event at Stafford and did extremely well, scoring 3/9 for a 2340 performance. More on page 53.
Unfair Play
As we know from politics, any legislation, however well intentioned, sometimes has unexpected consequences, even negative consequences. We also know that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Ever since the Olympiad in 2022 at Chennai, FIDE events have had the joy sucked out of them to varying degrees by the activities and policies of the Fair Play Commission. FIDE understandably felt it had to act after a few high-profile scandals and made the now – with hindsight – clearly terrible decision to devolve the implementation of fair play measures into a new Commission with sweeping powers, over and above those of the arbiters. Ironically, it all has the whiff of Soviet times, in that, to draw a rough parallel, jobbing policeman became subservient and were ruled by a new more secretive group (KGB/FSB) of policemen with absolute power. So it came to pass in FIDE that the Arbiters Commission and the arbiters themselves found that a smaller number of their erstwhile colleagues (and friends; relationships of decades’ standing have been fractured) now ruled over them with more and more sweeping powers, employed in the name of preventing cheating.
There’s hardly been any instances of cheating in FIDE events, although nobody denies the need for professionally implemented anti-cheating measures. There is general agreement about delaying transmission of moves nowadays, but things have got completely out of hand. This is largely due to the laissez-faire attitude of those in the upper echelons of the governing body, including the President and Managing Director. Let me give you a fairly recent example from the 2022 Olympiad at Chennai. There was a separate corridor outside the playing hall separated by two sets of double doors with excellent soundproofing, where players and captains could get coffee and the toilets were located. The area was patrolled by arbiters and Fair Play operatives, and rightly so. I was getting a coffee during one of England’s games, when I met my old chum GM Ivan Sokolov. We hadn’t seen each other for years, so we had a chat. Up bounds the (then) chairman of the Fair Play Commission Yuri Garrett, someone for whom I’ve come to develop almost unlimited contempt for over the last few years and whose recent downfall – see below – I can only take the greatest delight in. “You can’t talk here!” he said. My initial reaction was that he was joking, but when I realised he was serious, I told him to get lost. Given that captains cannot open their mouths in the playing hall nowadays and have been reduced to the role of waiters, the idea that we might be cheating by consorting in an outside corridor is absurd, but not for Yuri. What followed was comedic, yet somehow sinister at the same time. We were literally in each other’s faces. “I’ll take your name and report you to the chief arbiter,” he said. “I think you know my name Yuri,” I replied. “We’ve known each other for about 20 years.” I think my subsequent words were unprintable and he slinked off. A few days later, I was watching the closing stages of the match between Azerbaijan and Armenia. Azeri board one Shakhriyar Mamedyarov had been frustrated in his game and had remained in his chair after it, staring into space as strong players do when they’re trying to figure out what the hell went wrong. At this point an Indian teenager turned up working for the Fair Play team and started trying to manhandle him from his chair and out of the playing hall. I was so outraged I said to the little whippersnapper, “This is one of the strongest players in the world and you will treat him with the respect he deserves. Now clear off!” Since August 2022 at Chennai things have got a lot worse. Fair Play rules have become both more restrictive and more invasive. At the Budapest Olympiad even federation presidents struggled to get into the playing hall. The arbiters too have become progressively more fed up with their Fair Play colleagues. As I said above, relationships have soured. Tournament organisers have baulked at the extra cost of engaging the extra Fair Play personnel, and players have become more and more upset. 
This year alone, the FIDE Council has received letters of complaint from the a self-styled “rebel group” of arbiters. That includes multiple arbiters who have been Chief Arbiter of at least five world championship matches between them, Chief Arbiters of several Olympiads, and our own Alex Holowczak (pictured left). In addition, a group of 13 established organisers of FIDE tournaments have written saying they are now discouraged from organising tournaments due to the extra cost and aggravation. The Mitropa European group of countries has also written to express their concern, and the cacophony has grown to such an extent that the players and captains’ petition I was going to organise, hardly seems worth it, given the volume of criticism that has been levelled at this Commission and its antics. What really needs to happen is that the Fair Play Commission needs to be merged with the Arbiters Commission, and some common sense needs to prevail in the implementation of anti-cheating measures. That's just a start, I have a lot of sympathy for the views expressed by the anonymous arbiter from the World Senior Teams at Prague – see below. The Fair Play Commission should be a separate body that will concentrate mainly on the technological threats we face in the battle against cheaters. Let the arbiters run the show, like they used to, and still do at every event that isn’t a FIDE event. FIDE’s reaction, which was really that of the President, who I had lobbied in person on this matter, has so far not been encouraging. The Chairman of the Fair Play Commission, Yuri Garrett, has been removed, but as far as I can tell the functions of the organisation remain intact. It remains for the FIDE Council which meets on March the 21st to take further action, which in my opinion should include the dissolution of this disastrous Commission. Recent events, including an open revolt from players and captains at the World Senior Teams in Prague, demonstrate the sorry state of affairs, where again players weren’t allowed to remain in the tournament hall after finishing their games, which is most unpopular. The following letter was sent by IM Nigel Povah to the FIDE Council following ridiculous goings on: Dear Mr Dvorkovich and FIDE colleagues, I’m writing to highlight the widespread concerns about the Fair Play regulations, that were expressed by many of the captains and players at the World Senior Team Chess Championships, which have just concluded in Prague. The attached email, which I sent to Mr Dvorkovich on 25 February was shared with the other players (including captains), who numbered over 500 in total, coming from 28 different Federations. I was only able to get access to some of those present, because we were playing in two different tournament halls and players from the 50+ tournament hall were not allowed access to the 65+ tournament hall, and vice versa. However, there was a Captains’ WhatsApp group and many of the captains expressed their support for the content of my email through that channel. I think I can say with some confidence that the vast majority of players present agreed with my comments and although many were willing to sign the letter to show their support, some made it clear that they were not able to speak on behalf of their federations. However, such was the strength of feeling, I would be astonished if most, if not all, federations would not concur with the views of their players. I hope the attached email clearly sets out what I was concerned about, but since writing this, I was alerted to two alarming examples of the post-game Fair Play checks, that seem to be totally out of proportion with what is required. The first case was reported to me first hand by IM Mehrshad Sharif, who told me that after a 15-move draw, he and his opponent were selected for random checking and taken to a room, where they were both thoroughly searched and this lasted about 30 minutes! Given the result of the game, suspicions of cheating would surely have been low and whilst random searches are generally a reasonable idea, the duration and nature of this sounds excessive. The second case, which I only heard about second-hand, sounds to have been far worse. A woman player had won her first four games and was searched after her game by two female Fair Play staff and was in effect ‘strip searched’, and I was told that she and her team mates were very upset by this. Hopefully they will report this themselves, but the point is that some of these Fair Play guidelines are just going too far, and they are spoiling the nature of what has always been a highly enjoyable and friendly series of chess events. I would also like to ask, has there ever been any examples of anyone caught cheating in Seniors’ chess, because I’m not aware of anyone having done so? I do appreciate that FIDE naturally wish to prevent/discourage cheating, but these preventative measures are penalising the vast majority of honest chess players. Perhaps FIDE should look to introduce much harsher penalties for anyone caught cheating and should publish and disgrace those individuals. Anyway, I do think that Senior chess players should be treated with a great deal more dignity and respect than is evident with these very harsh Fair Play regulations. Finally, I hope that FIDE will give some serious thought to this matter, as I don’t think things should continue as they are. - Nigel Povah - IM and England Chess Federation Seniors Manager  One arbiter at Prague added: “It looks like the whole world – except for a few fools in FIDE’s leadership – understands that the World Senior Championship isn’t a top-tier event like the World Championship title matches or the Olympiad. It’s primarily a social gathering where old players meet up with long-lost friends. Banning hearing aids – without which many are completely deaf [Ed. – This happened in the 2024 event.] – kicking them out of the playing hall as soon as they finish their games, or suspecting them of assembling a computer in the toilet (which is the official explanation from the Fair Play commission for why you can’t have a SIM card hidden in your wallet so as not to lose it) immediately turns them against the organisers. “We tried to be somewhat accommodating, but some Fair Play arbiters reported us to Mr. Garrett, who then ordered them to tighten the checks even more. That led to long queues forming at the entrance, which the seniors certainly didn’t appreciate. Moreover, they found pocket searches and wallet inspections undignified and humiliating. And that’s how the letter from England captain came about. “One of the Fair Play arbiters said that while the experience helped him get to the Olympiad, he never wants to do this job again. They don’t have thick enough skin to voluntarily spend ten days as a ‘useful idiot’ hated by all sides – players, organisers, actual arbiters, and even their own supervisor in the end. “Everyone agrees the entire Fair Play commission should be abolished immediately, its members should apologise to the chess community for ruining their beloved pastime (no wonder no one wants to host FIDE events anymore), and its leadership should be publicly punished – exclusion from the chess community and a subsequent public execution would be the bare minimum. The only debate is whether the highest official should bear personal responsibility as well.” I can only add that it’s high time for change, but nobody needs to die! Correspondence Mysteries There has recently been speculation that there may be a new Leigh Strange, or at least the conduct of the Welsh player Rhys Jones in the 2022-24 British Correspondence Championship (fittingly named as the Penrose Memorial Championship) was rather strange. Jones overstepped the time limit in three games – as early as move 7, move 8 and move 7. He then carried on playing his other 12 games, drawing all of them. Unsurprisingly this did not prove popular with his fellow competitors, but seemingly there was nothing that Tournament Director Gordon Anderson could do. Of course, in the interest of fairness, Jones should have withdrawn from the tournament straight after his losses. Unfortunately, in this age of extremely strong engines, all the other games were drawn, meaning that the three players gifted a point by Jones shared the British title. Complaints were raised and the identity of the seemingly enigmatic Jones queried. The Welsh Correspondence Chess Federation (WCCF) and the ICCF appeared convinced that Jones was a genuine player and that the result should stand, although despite requests he has never provided any verifiable documents to prove his identity. Dissatisfied and determined to identify Jones, English CC GM John Brookes has begun legal action against Russell Sherwood, a fellow participant in the Penrose Memorial. Until recently, Sherwood was also the Secretary of the WCCF, as well as the National Delegate for Wales when Rhys Jones’s account was registered. Notably he is still the Finance Director of the ICCF and the Treasurer of the WCCF. Brookes believes that Jones’s losses on time correspond with a period when Sherwood had taken, as is permitted in correspondence chess, holiday leave or, if you prefer, had adjourned all his games. A coincidence or evidence of a connection between Sherwood and Jones? That is yet to be determined. Brookes believes that upholding the integrity of the British Correspondence Chess Championship, a tournament which has been running since 1921, is vital and is seeking to claim the amount he would have won had 14 players tied for first in the tournament from Sherwood. The matter will be determined in due course. From his writings on welshccf.org.uk, Sherwood is clearly an expert in neural networks and chess engines. He also lost the final game in the 2017 Welsh Correspondence Championship... to wife Helen Sherwood. That gave her the title with 9.5/12, by half a point from Gareth Yeo. An unfortunate situation indeed. Interestingly the Sherwoods’ son, Alexander, was also in the tournament. All three have played a great many games in ICCF events. Are they really a correspondence mad family, or could Russell Sherwood be at least largely assisting with the moves of his wife and son? From initial checks by one expert on chess engines, we were informed that “affinity among the three Sherwoods seems fairly clear”, but also that many more checks were required. Let us hope they happen. A player controlling more than one account in a tournament would clearly be at an advantage. It appears that the ICCF have questions to answer regarding their Finance Director. Ideally more anti-cheating checks can be conducted and existing evidence published. Boris Spassky RIP  The 10th world chess champion, Boris Spassky, was a true gentleman and a brilliant attacker. He will be forever remembered as the man who was defeated by Bobby Fischer and let us not forget what a gallant loser he was. Spassky was a ‘quiet dissident’ in the Soviet Union, never on board with Communist ideology, but never rocking the boat sufficiently to incur the wrath of the authorities. A few years after his defeat, and with Anatoly Karpov safely ensconced as world champion following Fischer’s abdication, Spassky was allowed to leave for France and even represented his adopted country in the Olympiad. Spassky played in the world championship cycle again, but could not overcome Karpov and subsequently would always bring a tennis racket to tournaments and gradually withdrew from active play. In recent years, following a stroke, suffered when he was resident in France, Spassky had been living near Moscow and had recovered well. He will also be remembered for being an extremely polite and approachable superstar, always willing to engage in analysis and he lit up the room whenever he turned up to a tournament. I readily recall him in the press room at the Park Lane hotel during the match between Karpov and Garry Kasparov in 1986, demanding of GM William Watson that he analyse just a little bit slower and if I remember right, it was there that he coined the term “mad machine gunner” when William demonstrated one particularly crazy variation. Spassky reportedly learnt the game on a long train journey as a child and followed the classic Soviet path of having his talent first noticed in a simultaneous display – it was actually against Mikhail Botvinnik – and then being sent to the Palace of Pioneers for coaching. His record in matchplay was outstanding and he had what was known as a universal style, although most of us will remember him for his attacking prowess. B.Spassky-T.Petrosian B.Spassky-L.Evans The London System  Lauren MacDonald with her installation The London System which was on display at Olympia. Passing members of the public were able to play with the set, featuring a fine contrast between the white and black pieces; the former having been treated with a protective, colourless oil, the latter having been ebonised. MacDonald explained that: “Mostly, I love chess, and this project was an excuse to combine my obsessions: a game I love to play, local materials, and solid craftsmanship.” I hope that we will see more chess-inspired projects from MacDonald, as well as see her over the board at some stage soon. |